← All chapters
250 / 1113 · Joshua 20 · Conquest & the Judges · c. 1400 or c. 1200 BC (debated)

Six Cities of Refuge

Debated
Read

A moment's carelessness: a lorry reversing, an axe-head flying off, a child in the wrong place. Someone is dead, and nobody meant it. In many societies, then and now, that is not the end. The victim's family feels bound to avenge the death, and one tragedy can turn into a feud that runs for generations. Ancient Israel knew this. The 'avenger of blood', the nearest male relative, had a duty to act. Joshua 20 builds a brake into the system: six towns, spread across the land, where a person who killed by accident can run and be safe until a fair hearing.

Where it sits in the story: Act 3 is not only about land; it is about what kind of society will live on it. Numbers 35 and Deuteronomy 19 commanded cities of refuge, and here they are finally named. After chapters of borders, this short chapter shows the law being built into the geography. Mercy and justice are placed within a day's run of anyone, on both sides of the Jordan.

What this chapter is doing: To name the six cities of refuge commanded through Moses, to distinguish accidental killing from murder, and to limit vengeance by giving the accused a place of safety and a fair trial.

The walk-through
  • 20:1–3 — God tells Joshua to appoint the cities of refuge spoken of through Moses, places for anyone who kills a person 'unintentionally, without knowing it', to escape the avenger of blood.
  • 20:4–6 — The procedure: the person states their case to the town elders at the gate, is taken in, and is not handed over. They stay until they stand trial before the congregation, and until the death of the high priest then in office. After that they may go home.
  • 20:7–9 — The six cities: Kedesh in Galilee, Shechem in Ephraim's hills and Hebron in Judah's; across the Jordan, Bezer, Ramoth in Gilead and Golan in Bashan. They are spread north, centre and south on both banks, open to Israelites and foreigners alike.
What it showsThe chapter matches the laws in Numbers 35 and Deuteronomy 19. Blood vengeance by a kinsman is well known from many traditional societies, and the Bible's distinction between intentional and unintentional killing is a real legal development.
Where the evidence stopsThere is no evidence outside the Bible that these six cities actually functioned as refuges. Some scholars think the system is a later idealised law, possibly replacing older sanctuary at the altar (see Exodus 21:14; 1 Kings 1:50), and its date is debated.

Key verse: Joshua 20:3  ·  So what: The law here refuses to treat every death as murder. It takes intention seriously, slows revenge down, and gives the accused a hearing before anyone acts. Communities still torn by feuds, caste violence or mob 'justice' need exactly that. Christian readers have also long seen in these cities a picture of refuge in God, a place to run to before judgment falls.

← Six Lots and a Lost InheritanceYou have just read the last six allotments and Joshua's own town (Joshua 19); here six cities of refuge are named. Next, forty-eight towns are given to the Levites, who have no territory of their own (Joshua 21).Towns for the Levites →
Sources & further reading
← All chapters