How do you fairly judge between competing worldviews? Three tests do most of the work: coherence — do a worldview's core claims hang together logically? consistency — does it contradict itself? and evidence — does it fit what we actually find in history and the world? These are the fairest tools we have, and honesty demands using them on every worldview equally, Christianity and the Bible included. A test is only worth using if you are willing to face it yourself.
- Three tests: logical coherence, internal consistency, and fit with the evidence.
- Applied to everyone equally — including the Bible and the Christian claim.
- Reason usually narrows the field and weighs credibility; it rarely 'proves' a whole worldview outright.
What the evidence showsLogical coherence, internal consistency and evidential fit are standard tools of reason that any worldview — religious or secular — can be examined by, on equal terms.
Where it stopsThe tests can weigh how reasonable a worldview is; they cannot by themselves compel faith or deliver mathematical proof about God. Ultimate questions are not settled the way equations are.
Sources & further reading